Peer Review Policy

All manuscripts submitted to Innovate: Innovation in Teaching and Learning undergo a double-blind peer review process to ensure academic rigor and objectivity. Each manuscript is reviewed by at least two independent reviewers with expertise relevant to the article’s subject matter. The reviewers remain anonymous to the authors, and vice versa, throughout the review process.

The editorial team evaluates all submissions for their relevance, originality, and methodological quality before forwarding them to peer reviewers. The possible outcomes of the review process include:

  1. Accepted without revision
  2. Accepted with minor revisions
  3. Major revisions required
  4. Rejected

Authors are expected to revise their manuscripts based on reviewers’ comments and resubmit them within the specified time. Final decisions regarding publication are made by the editorial board, taking into account reviewers’ recommendations and the overall quality of the submission.