Peer Review Process

All manuscripts submitted to Innovate: Innovation in Teaching and Learning undergo a double-blind peer review process. In this system, the identities of both authors and reviewers are concealed to ensure objective and unbiased evaluations.

Each submission is reviewed by at least two reviewers who are experts in the relevant field. The review process evaluates the manuscript’s originality, relevance, methodology, theoretical and practical contribution, and clarity of presentation.

Reviewers provide constructive feedback to help authors improve the quality of their work. Based on the review, the possible decisions are:

• Accepted without revision

• Accepted with minor revisions

• Accepted with major revisions

• Rejected

The final decision is made by the Editor, taking into account the reviewers’ recommendations and the alignment with the journal’s scope and aims. Accepted articles are scheduled for publication based on the date of final acceptance, thematic distribution, and the institutional and geographic diversity of authors.